REVIEW 2 cited by
Sensor-Independent Illumination Estimation for DNN Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While modern deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve state-of-the-art results for illuminant estimation, it is currently necessary to train a separate DNN for each type of camera sensor. This means when a camera manufacturer uses a new sensor, it is necessary to retrain an existing DNN model with training images captured by the new sensor. This paper addresses this problem by introducing a novel sensor-independent illuminant estimation framework. Our method learns a sensor-independent working space that can be used to canonicalize the RGB values of any arbitrary camera sensor. Our learned space retains the linear property of the original sensor raw-RGB space and allows unseen camera sensors to be used on a single DNN model trained on this working space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several different camera sensors and show it provides performance on par with state-of-the-art methods that were trained per sensor.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RL-AWB: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Auto White Balance Correction in Low-Light Night-time Scenes
RL-AWB uses reinforcement learning to optimize parameters of a statistical white-balance estimator for nighttime scenes and reports better generalization on a new multi-sensor dataset.
-
RL-AWB: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Auto White Balance Correction in Low-Light Night-time Scenes
RL-AWB uses a soft actor-critic RL agent to per-image tune a novel gray-pixel illuminant estimator, achieving competitive nighttime white balance with only five training images and better cross-sensor generalization t...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.