Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Long-length Legal Document Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.06905 v1 pith:W5CAFT6C submitted 2019-12-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords legalclassificationdocumenttextdocumentslengthymodelsresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the principal tasks of machine learning with major applications is text classification. This paper focuses on the legal domain and, in particular, on the classification of lengthy legal documents. The main challenge that this study addresses is the limitation that current models impose on the length of the input text. In addition, the present paper shows that dividing the text into segments and later combining the resulting embeddings with a BiLSTM architecture to form a single document embedding can improve results. These advancements are achieved by utilising a simpler structure, rather than an increasingly complex one, which is often the case in NLP research. The dataset used in this paper is obtained from an online public database containing lengthy legal documents with highly domain-specific vocabulary and thus, the comparison of our results to the ones produced by models implemented on the commonly used datasets would be unjustified. This work provides the foundation for future work in document classification in the legal field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CHANCERY: Evaluating Corporate Governance Reasoning Capabilities in Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 502-question benchmark for corporate governance reasoning shows current language models reach at most 78.1 percent accuracy.

  2. SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts--Extended Version

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 15 small language models across 23 datasets and 11 metrics shows clear accuracy-versus-energy trade-offs, with no single model dominating.

Pith tools