Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Guaranteeing Safety for Neural Network-Based Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.07084 v2 pith:5RQARH6W submitted 2019-12-15 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords neuralnetworkaircraftavoidancecollisionmethodsafetysystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The decision logic for the ACAS X family of aircraft collision avoidance systems is represented as a large numeric table. Due to storage constraints of certified avionics hardware, neural networks have been suggested as a way to significantly compress the data while still preserving performance in terms of safety. However, neural networks are complex continuous functions with outputs that are difficult to predict. Because simulations evaluate only a finite number of encounters, simulations are not sufficient to guarantee that the neural network will perform correctly in all possible situations. We propose a method to provide safety guarantees when using a neural network collision avoidance system. The neural network outputs are bounded using neural network verification tools like Reluplex and Reluval, and a reachability method determines all possible ways aircraft encounters will resolve using neural network advisories and assuming bounded aircraft dynamics. Experiments with systems inspired by ACAS X show that neural networks giving either horizontal or vertical maneuvers can be proven safe. We explore how relaxing the bounds on aircraft dynamics can lead to potentially unsafe encounters and demonstrate how neural network controllers can be modified to guarantee safety through online costs or lowering alerting cost. The reachability method is flexible and can incorporate uncertainties such as pilot delay and sensor error. These results suggest a method for certifying neural network collision avoidance systems for use in real aircraft.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Of Good Demons and Bad Angels: Guaranteeing Safe Control under Finite Precision

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A dL/dGL-based method that verifies infinite-horizon safety of neural network controllers under bounded finite-precision perturbations and synthesizes sound mixed-precision fixed-point implementations.

Pith tools