REVIEW 2 cited by
Enabling Value Sensitive AI Systems through Participatory Design Fictions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Two general routes have been followed to develop artificial agents that are sensitive to human values---a top-down approach to encode values into the agents, and a bottom-up approach to learn from human actions, whether from real-world interactions or stories. Although both approaches have made exciting scientific progress, they may face challenges when applied to the current development practices of AI systems, which require the under-standing of the specific domains and specific stakeholders involved. In this work, we bring together perspectives from the human-computer interaction (HCI) community, where designing technologies sensitive to user values has been a longstanding focus. We highlight several well-established areas focusing on developing empirical methods for inquiring user values. Based on these methods, we propose participatory design fictions to study user values involved in AI systems and present preliminary results from a case study. With this paper, we invite the consideration of user-centered value inquiry and value learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Identifying and Understanding Human Values in Text: A Tailorable LLM-based Architecture
A modular LLM architecture generates value specifications from theory texts, then detects and intensity-rates human values in arbitrary text, evaluated at ~0.34 micro-F1 on ValueEval.
-
RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AI
Across 37 participatory AI projects and 5 interviews, the paper finds recruitment practice is under-documented and relationship-driven, and recommends reflexive documentation and institutional support.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.