REVIEW 1 cited by
Geometry-Aware Generation of Adversarial Point Clouds
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Machine learning models have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. While most of the existing methods for adversarial attack and defense work on the 2D image domain, a few recent attempts have been made to extend them to 3D point cloud data. However, adversarial results obtained by these methods typically contain point outliers, which are both noticeable and easy to defend against using the simple techniques of outlier removal. Motivated by the different mechanisms by which humans perceive 2D images and 3D shapes, in this paper we propose the new design of \emph{geometry-aware objectives}, whose solutions favor (the discrete versions of) the desired surface properties of smoothness and fairness. To generate adversarial point clouds, we use a targeted attack misclassification loss that supports continuous pursuit of increasingly malicious signals. Regularizing the targeted attack loss with our proposed geometry-aware objectives results in our proposed method, Geometry-Aware Adversarial Attack ($GeoA^3$). The results of $GeoA^3$ tend to be more harmful, arguably harder to defend against, and of the key adversarial characterization of being imperceptible to humans. While the main focus of this paper is to learn to generate adversarial point clouds, we also present a simple but effective algorithm termed $Geo_{+}A^3$-IterNormPro, with Iterative Normal Projection (IterNorPro) that solves a new objective function $Geo_{+}A^3$, towards surface-level adversarial attacks via generation of adversarial point clouds. We quantitatively evaluate our methods on both synthetic and physical objects in terms of attack success rate and geometric regularity. For a qualitative evaluation, we conduct subjective studies by collecting human preferences from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Comparative results in comprehensive experiments confirm the advantages of our proposed methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Revisiting Physically Realizable Adversarial Object Attack against LiDAR-based Detection: Clarifying Problem Formulation and Experimental Protocols
The paper contributes an open-source benchmark framework and evaluation protocol for physical adversarial object attacks against LiDAR detection, with systematic loss and hyperparameter ablations and a sim-to-real dem...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.