REVIEW 1 cited by
What do QAOA energies reveal about graphs?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm to approximately solve NP optimization problems such as MAX-CUT. We describe a new application area of QAOA circuits: graph structure discovery. We omit the time-consuming parameter-optimization phase and utilize the dependence of QAOA energy on the graph structure for randomly or judiciously chosen parameters to learn about graphs. In the first part, Following up on Wang et. al. and Brandao et. al. we give explicit formulas. We show that the layer-one QAOA energy for the MAX-CUT problem for three regular graphs carries exactly the information: {\em (# of vertices, # of triangles)}. We have calculated our explicit formulas differently from \cite{wang2018quantum}, by developing the notion of the $U$ polynomial of a graph $G$. Many of our discoveries can be interpreted as computing $U(G)$ under various restrictions. The most basic question when comparing the structure of two graphs is if they are isomorphic or not. We find that the QAOA energies separate all non-isomorphic three-regular graphs up to size 18, all strongly regular graphs up to size 26 and the Praust and the smallest Miyazaki examples. We observe that the QAOA energy values can be also used as a proxy to how much graphs differ. Unfortunately, we have also found a sequence of non-isomorphic pairs of graphs, for which the energy gap seems to shrink at an exponential rate as the size grows. Our negative findings however come with a surprise: if the QAOA energies do not measurably separate between two graphs, then both of their energy landscapes must be extremely flat (indistinguishable from constant), already when the number of QAOA layers is intermediately large. This holds due to a remarkable uncoupling phenomenon that we have only deduced from computer simulation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating QAOA expectation values can be as hard as counting optimal solutions
QAOA MaxCut expectation values at depth p≥2 are #P-hard to evaluate exactly or to exponential precision, because their extreme Laurent coefficient encodes the maximum-cut count.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.