REVIEW 1 cited by
Reframing SU(1,1) interferometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
SU(1,1) interferometry, proposed in a classic 1986 paper by Yurke, McCall, and Klauder [Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986)], involves squeezing, displacing, and then unsqueezing two bosonic modes. It has, over the past decade, been implemented in a variety of experiments. Here I take SU(1,1) interferometry apart, to see how and why it ticks. SU(1,1) interferometry arises naturally as the two-mode version of active-squeezing-enhanced, back-action-evading measurements aimed at detecting the phase-space displacement of a harmonic oscillator subjected to a classical force. Truncating an SU(1,1) interferometer, by omitting the second two-mode squeezer, leaves a prototype that uses the entanglement of two-mode squeezing to detect and characterize a disturbance on one of the two modes from measurement statistics gathered from both modes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
In situ characterization of linear-optical networks in randomized boson sampling
A distributed protocol lets one party characterize a lossy linear-optical network during randomized boson sampling by using heterodyne measurements on shared squeezed light, with effort that grows linearly in the numb...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.