REVIEW 2 cited by
Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper we propose a novel image representation called face X-ray for detecting forgery in face images. The face X-ray of an input face image is a greyscale image that reveals whether the input image can be decomposed into the blending of two images from different sources. It does so by showing the blending boundary for a forged image and the absence of blending for a real image. We observe that most existing face manipulation methods share a common step: blending the altered face into an existing background image. For this reason, face X-ray provides an effective way for detecting forgery generated by most existing face manipulation algorithms. Face X-ray is general in the sense that it only assumes the existence of a blending step and does not rely on any knowledge of the artifacts associated with a specific face manipulation technique. Indeed, the algorithm for computing face X-ray can be trained without fake images generated by any of the state-of-the-art face manipulation methods. Extensive experiments show that face X-ray remains effective when applied to forgery generated by unseen face manipulation techniques, while most existing face forgery detection or deepfake detection algorithms experience a significant performance drop.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection
A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.
-
Detecting Deepfake Talking Heads from Facial Biometric Anomalies
A lightweight XGBoost classifier trained on statistical moments of pairwise ArcFace biometric similarities can distinguish real talking-head videos from face-swap and lip-sync deepfakes with around 95% accuracy on mat...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.