Pith. sign in

REVIEW

BNAS:An Efficient Neural Architecture Search Approach Using Broad Scalable Architecture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.06679 v5 pith:N65DM2QP submitted 2020-01-18 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords architecturebnasbroadscalablemillionsneuralparameterssearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose Broad Neural Architecture Search (BNAS) where we elaborately design broad scalable architecture dubbed Broad Convolutional Neural Network (BCNN) to solve the above issue. On one hand, the proposed broad scalable architecture has fast training speed due to its shallow topology. Moreover, we also adopt reinforcement learning and parameter sharing used in ENAS as the optimization strategy of BNAS. Hence, the proposed approach can achieve higher search efficiency. On the other hand, the broad scalable architecture extracts multi-scale features and enhancement representations, and feeds them into global average pooling layer to yield more reasonable and comprehensive representations. Therefore, the performance of broad scalable architecture can be promised. In particular, we also develop two variants for BNAS who modify the topology of BCNN. In order to verify the effectiveness of BNAS, several experiments are performed and experimental results show that 1) BNAS delivers 0.19 days which is 2.37x less expensive than ENAS who ranks the best in reinforcement learning-based NAS approaches, 2) compared with small-size (0.5 millions parameters) and medium-size (1.1 millions parameters) models, the architecture learned by BNAS obtains state-of-the-art performance (3.58% and 3.24% test error) on CIFAR-10, 3) the learned architecture achieves 25.3% top-1 error on ImageNet just using 3.9 millions parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools