REVIEW
2019/20 Lessons from $\tau (\Omega_c^0)$ \& $\tau (\Xi_c^0)$ and {\bf CP} asymmetry in charm decays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Our 2003 "Cicerone" had discussed charm dynamics with different directions and levels \cite{CICERONE}. Here we focus on two items, where the `landscape' has changed sizably. (A) The lifetimes \& semi-leptonic decays of charm hadrons show the impact of non-perturbative QCD and to which degree one can apply Heavy Quark Expansion (HQE) for charm hadrons. It is more complex as we have learnt from 2019/20 data. (B) {\bf CP} asymmetry has been established in 2019 \cite{LHCbGuy}: $\Delta A_{\bf CP} \equiv A_{\bf CP}(D^0 \to K^+K^-) - A_{\bf CP}(D^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-) $=$\, -\, (1.54 \pm 0.29 ) \cdot 10^{-3}$ is quite an achievement by the LHCb collaboration! Our community is at the beginning of a long travel for fundamental dynamics. Can the SM account for these? We discuss the assumptions that were made up to 2018 data and new conclusions from 2019/20 ones. We need more data; however, one has to discuss correlations between different transitions. We give an {\bf Appendix} what we have learnt for large {\bf CP} asymmetry in $K_L \to \pi^+\pi^-e^+e^-$.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.