Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scientific Image Tampering Detection Based On Noise Inconsistencies: A Method And Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.07799 v2 pith:TYOHPS4U submitted 2020-01-21 cs.CV eess.IV

classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords imagestamperingdetectionimagemethodscientificdifferentscience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scientific image tampering is a problem that affects not only authors but also the general perception of the research community. Although previous researchers have developed methods to identify tampering in natural images, these methods may not thrive under the scientific setting as scientific images have different statistics, format, quality, and intentions. Therefore, we propose a scientific-image specific tampering detection method based on noise inconsistencies, which is capable of learning and generalizing to different fields of science. We train and test our method on a new dataset of manipulated western blot and microscopy imagery, which aims at emulating problematic images in science. The test results show that our method can detect various types of image manipulation in different scenarios robustly, and it outperforms existing general-purpose image tampering detection schemes. We discuss applications beyond these two types of images and suggest next steps for making detection of problematic images a systematic step in peer review and science in general.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools