REVIEW 1 cited by
Non-Determinism in TensorFlow ResNets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We show that the stochasticity in training ResNets for image classification on GPUs in TensorFlow is dominated by the non-determinism from GPUs, rather than by the initialisation of the weights and biases of the network or by the sequence of minibatches given. The standard deviation of test set accuracy is 0.02 with fixed seeds, compared to 0.027 with different seeds---nearly 74\% of the standard deviation of a ResNet model is non-deterministic. For test set loss the ratio of standard deviations is more than 80\%. These results call for more robust evaluation strategies of deep learning models, as a significant amount of the variation in results across runs can arise simply from GPU randomness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Omega-S: A Functional Resilience Index for LLM Fine-Tuning
Omega-S, a penalty on node-degree variance in the weight matrix, improves code retention during LoRA fine-tuning of Llama-3-8B, while its advertised clustering/topological channel is inert.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.