Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models by Mutual Information Neural Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.08129 v3 pith:KZF6FZ6O submitted 2020-02-19 stat.ML cs.LGstat.COstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.COstat.ME
keywords designmodelsimplicitbayesianexperimentaldataneuralapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Implicit stochastic models, where the data-generation distribution is intractable but sampling is possible, are ubiquitous in the natural sciences. The models typically have free parameters that need to be inferred from data collected in scientific experiments. A fundamental question is how to design the experiments so that the collected data are most useful. The field of Bayesian experimental design advocates that, ideally, we should choose designs that maximise the mutual information (MI) between the data and the parameters. For implicit models, however, this approach is severely hampered by the high computational cost of computing posteriors and maximising MI, in particular when we have more than a handful of design variables to optimise. In this paper, we propose a new approach to Bayesian experimental design for implicit models that leverages recent advances in neural MI estimation to deal with these issues. We show that training a neural network to maximise a lower bound on MI allows us to jointly determine the optimal design and the posterior. Simulation studies illustrate that this gracefully extends Bayesian experimental design for implicit models to higher design dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JADAI: Jointly Amortizing Adaptive Design and Bayesian Inference

    stat.ML 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    JADAI jointly trains a design policy, a history encoder, and a diffusion-based posterior estimator end-to-end, using per-step posterior-loss reductions as a proxy for information gain, and reaches state-of-the-art per...

  2. Optimizing Likelihoods via Mutual Information: Bridging Simulation-Based Inference and Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SBI-BOED trains a normalizing-flow likelihood surrogate while optimizing experimental designs via InfoNCE-style mutual information bounds, and works when the simulator is non-differentiable.

Pith tools