REVIEW 3 cited by
Bandits with Mean Bounds
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study a variant of the bandit problem where side information in the form of bounds on the mean of each arm is provided. We prove that these translate to tighter estimates of subgaussian factors and develop novel algorithms that exploit these estimates. In the linear setting, we present the Restricted-set OFUL (R-OFUL) algorithm that additionally uses the geometric properties of the problem to (potentially) restrict the set of arms being played and reduce exploration rates for suboptimal arms. In the stochastic case, we propose the non-optimistic Global Under-Explore (GLUE) algorithm which employs the inferred subgaussian estimates to adapt the rate of exploration for the arms. We analyze the regret of R-OFUL and GLUE, showing that our regret upper bounds are never worse than that of the standard OFUL and UCB algorithms respectively. Further, we also consider a practically motivated setting of learning from confounded logs where mean bounds appear naturally.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Decentralized Relaxed Smooth Optimization with Gradient Descent Methods
A decentralized gradient descent method with adaptive clipping is claimed to reach best-known convergence rates for convex and nonconvex problems under (L0,L1)-smoothness without knowing the constants.
-
Using causal abstractions to accelerate decision-making in complex bandit problems
AT-UCB uses a cheap abstracted causal model to filter out suboptimal actions before running UCB on the expensive base model, with a regret bound that improves when the abstraction is accurate.
-
Deconfounded Warm-Start Thompson Sampling with Applications to Precision Medicine
DWTS debiases and selects features from observational data, then warm-starts Thompson sampling with those estimates, achieving lower cumulative regret than LinTS in simulations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.