Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing View-Based and Map-Based Semantic Labelling in Real-Time SLAM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10342 v1 pith:DRO4WZVX submitted 2020-02-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords labellingmap-basedsceneview-basedcomparisonlabelsmodelreal-time
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generally capable Spatial AI systems must build persistent scene representations where geometric models are combined with meaningful semantic labels. The many approaches to labelling scenes can be divided into two clear groups: view-based which estimate labels from the input view-wise data and then incrementally fuse them into the scene model as it is built; and map-based which label the generated scene model. However, there has so far been no attempt to quantitatively compare view-based and map-based labelling. Here, we present an experimental framework and comparison which uses real-time height map fusion as an accessible platform for a fair comparison, opening up the route to further systematic research in this area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools