Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Two Regimes of Deep Network Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10376 v1 pith:RRGAYXSJ submitted 2020-02-24 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningratetrainingdeepexhibitsmodelsoptimizationperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning rate schedule has a major impact on the performance of deep learning models. Still, the choice of a schedule is often heuristical. We aim to develop a precise understanding of the effects of different learning rate schedules and the appropriate way to select them. To this end, we isolate two distinct phases of training, the first, which we refer to as the "large-step" regime, exhibits a rather poor performance from an optimization point of view but is the primary contributor to model generalization; the latter, "small-step" regime exhibits much more "convex-like" optimization behavior but used in isolation produces models that generalize poorly. We find that by treating these regimes separately-and em specializing our training algorithm to each one of them, we can significantly simplify learning rate schedules.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling depth capacity via zero/one-layer model expansion

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training GPT2 from a zero/one-layer model and expanding depth at 80% of the schedule reaches fixed-size loss with approximately 5x less compute.

Pith tools