Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Lagrangian Decomposition for Neural Network Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10410 v3 pith:YBMNZ3GA submitted 2020-02-24 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords boundsalgorithmslagrangianneuralprevioustheyverificationalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A fundamental component of neural network verification is the computation of bounds on the values their outputs can take. Previous methods have either used off-the-shelf solvers, discarding the problem structure, or relaxed the problem even further, making the bounds unnecessarily loose. We propose a novel approach based on Lagrangian Decomposition. Our formulation admits an efficient supergradient ascent algorithm, as well as an improved proximal algorithm. Both the algorithms offer three advantages: (i) they yield bounds that are provably at least as tight as previous dual algorithms relying on Lagrangian relaxations; (ii) they are based on operations analogous to forward/backward pass of neural networks layers and are therefore easily parallelizable, amenable to GPU implementation and able to take advantage of the convolutional structure of problems; and (iii) they allow for anytime stopping while still providing valid bounds. Empirically, we show that we obtain bounds comparable with off-the-shelf solvers in a fraction of their running time, and obtain tighter bounds in the same time as previous dual algorithms. This results in an overall speed-up when employing the bounds for formal verification. Code for our algorithms is available at https://github.com/oval-group/decomposition-plnn-bounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A requirement-model-driven multi-agent LLM pipeline generates traceable MDE artefacts and formally checks behaviour models, with multi-agent reliably improving syntactic validity but not semantic accuracy across LLMs.

  2. Formal Foundations for Controlled Stochastic Activity Networks

    cs.FL 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A formal extension of stochastic activity networks with explicit control actions, equipped with automata semantics, policy hierarchies, and a claimed reduction to CTMDPs, but with numerous unsupported proofs.

Pith tools