REVIEW 1 cited by
IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The adoption of machine learning in health care hinges on the transparency of the used algorithms, necessitating the need for explanation methods. However, despite a growing literature on explaining neural networks, no consensus has been reached on how to evaluate those explanation methods. We propose IROF, a new approach to evaluating explanation methods that circumvents the need for manual evaluation. Compared to other recent work, our approach requires several orders of magnitude less computational resources and no human input, making it accessible to lower resource groups and robust to human bias.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Value bounds and Convergence Analysis for Averages of LRP attributions
Averaged LRP-beta attributions have Hoeffding convergence bounds independent of weight norms, unlike gradient-based explanations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.