Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.08747 v1 pith:TG5TM5AI submitted 2020-03-09 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords explanationmethodsapproachevaluationhumanirofneedresource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The adoption of machine learning in health care hinges on the transparency of the used algorithms, necessitating the need for explanation methods. However, despite a growing literature on explaining neural networks, no consensus has been reached on how to evaluate those explanation methods. We propose IROF, a new approach to evaluating explanation methods that circumvents the need for manual evaluation. Compared to other recent work, our approach requires several orders of magnitude less computational resources and no human input, making it accessible to lower resource groups and robust to human bias.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Value bounds and Convergence Analysis for Averages of LRP attributions

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Averaged LRP-beta attributions have Hoeffding convergence bounds independent of weight norms, unlike gradient-based explanations.

Pith tools