Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Models via Mutual Information

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.09379 v1 pith:POJPT73D submitted 2020-03-20 stat.ML cs.LGstat.COstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.COstat.ME
keywords modelsimplicitsequentialbayesianbeendatadesignexperimental
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian experimental design (BED) is a framework that uses statistical models and decision making under uncertainty to optimise the cost and performance of a scientific experiment. Sequential BED, as opposed to static BED, considers the scenario where we can sequentially update our beliefs about the model parameters through data gathered in the experiment. A class of models of particular interest for the natural and medical sciences are implicit models, where the data generating distribution is intractable, but sampling from it is possible. Even though there has been a lot of work on static BED for implicit models in the past few years, the notoriously difficult problem of sequential BED for implicit models has barely been touched upon. We address this gap in the literature by devising a novel sequential design framework for parameter estimation that uses the Mutual Information (MI) between model parameters and simulated data as a utility function to find optimal experimental designs, which has not been done before for implicit models. Our approach uses likelihood-free inference by ratio estimation to simultaneously estimate posterior distributions and the MI. During the sequential BED procedure we utilise Bayesian optimisation to help us optimise the MI utility. We find that our framework is efficient for the various implicit models tested, yielding accurate parameter estimates after only a few iterations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Active Learning of Model Discrepancy with Bayesian Experimental Design

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid framework alternates Bayesian experimental design for physics parameters with gradient-based calibration of a neural network model-discrepancy term, gated by an ensemble Kalman information-gain indicator.

Pith tools