Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluating complexity and resilience trade-offs in emerging memory inference machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.10396 v1 pith:YPBLDRI4 submitted 2020-02-25 cs.NE cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.NEcs.LGstat.ML
keywords complexityinferenceneuralresilienceworkaccuracycollapsecompact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neuromorphic-style inference only works well if limited hardware resources are maximized properly, e.g. accuracy continues to scale with parameters and complexity in the face of potential disturbance. In this work, we use realistic crossbar simulations to highlight that compact implementations of deep neural networks are unexpectedly susceptible to collapse from multiple system disturbances. Our work proposes a middle path towards high performance and strong resilience utilizing the Mosaics framework, and specifically by re-using synaptic connections in a recurrent neural network implementation that possesses a natural form of noise-immunity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools