Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Deep Learning for Scientific Discovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.11755 v1 pith:JKPIPQ3R submitted 2020-03-26 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords deeplearningscientificdatadifferentmanymethodsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past few years, we have seen fundamental breakthroughs in core problems in machine learning, largely driven by advances in deep neural networks. At the same time, the amount of data collected in a wide array of scientific domains is dramatically increasing in both size and complexity. Taken together, this suggests many exciting opportunities for deep learning applications in scientific settings. But a significant challenge to this is simply knowing where to start. The sheer breadth and diversity of different deep learning techniques makes it difficult to determine what scientific problems might be most amenable to these methods, or which specific combination of methods might offer the most promising first approach. In this survey, we focus on addressing this central issue, providing an overview of many widely used deep learning models, spanning visual, sequential and graph structured data, associated tasks and different training methods, along with techniques to use deep learning with less data and better interpret these complex models --- two central considerations for many scientific use cases. We also include overviews of the full design process, implementation tips, and links to a plethora of tutorials, research summaries and open-sourced deep learning pipelines and pretrained models, developed by the community. We hope that this survey will help accelerate the use of deep learning across different scientific domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When is a System Discoverable from Data? Discovery Requires Chaos

    math.DS 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Uniquely identifying an ODE from trajectory data depends on the trajectory filling enough of the state space: chaos on a high-dimensional attractor yields analytic discoverability, while first integrals preclude it.

  2. Advancing the Scientific Method with Large Language Models: From Hypothesis to Discovery

    cs.AI 2025-05 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A perspective review argues that LLMs should be deeply integrated into all stages of science, with human oversight and clear metrics, to become creative engines.

Pith tools