Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Reproducing the Universe: a comparison between the EAGLE simulations and the nearby DustPedia galaxy sample

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.12576 v1 pith:WQAROPJV submitted 2020-03-27 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiescomparisoneaglepropertiessimulationsagreementcodecompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We compare the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and inferred physical properties for simulated and observed galaxies at low redshift. We exploit UV-submillimetre mock fluxes of ~7000 z=0 galaxies from the EAGLE suite of cosmological simulations, derived using the radiative transfer code SKIRT. We compare these to ~800 observed galaxies in the UV-submillimetre range, from the DustPedia sample of nearby galaxies. To derive global properties, we apply the SED fitting code CIGALE consistently to both data sets, using the same set of ~80 million models. The results of this comparison reveal overall agreement between the simulations and observations, both in the SEDs and in the derived physical properties, with a number of discrepancies. The optical and far-infrared regimes, and the scaling relations based upon the global emission, diffuse dust and stellar mass, show high levels of agreement. However, the mid-infrared fluxes of the EAGLE galaxies are overestimated while the far-UV domain is not attenuated enough, compared to the observations. We attribute these discrepancies to a combination of galaxy population differences between the samples, and limitations in the subgrid treatment of star-forming regions in the EAGLE-SKIRT post-processing recipe. Our findings show the importance of detailed radiative transfer calculations and consistent comparison, and provide suggestions for improved numerical models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MixQuant: Adaptive Mixed-Precision Quantization for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A single calibration that marginalizes layer distortion over random quantized upstream contexts yields budget-agnostic bit allocations that beat FP16-scored adaptive baselines across Llama-3.2-3B, Llama-2-7B, and Mistral-7B.

  2. The COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline: Calibration-free dust radiative transfer postprocessing for cosmological simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline reproduces the observed low-redshift cosmic SED without calibrating the post-processing, using live dust from the simulation and a new 'split & scale' grain-size mapping.

  3. Interstellar dust production, destruction and effects of dust depletion in galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper reviews dust production, destruction and growth processes in galaxies, compiles literature data on comoving dust mass density, presents evidence for and against interstellar dust growth, and identifies the h...

Pith tools