REVIEW 2 cited by
Tensor Decompositions for temporal knowledge base completion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Most algorithms for representation learning and link prediction in relational data have been designed for static data. However, the data they are applied to usually evolves with time, such as friend graphs in social networks or user interactions with items in recommender systems. This is also the case for knowledge bases, which contain facts such as (US, has president, B. Obama, [2009-2017]) that are valid only at certain points in time. For the problem of link prediction under temporal constraints, i.e., answering queries such as (US, has president, ?, 2012), we propose a solution inspired by the canonical decomposition of tensors of order 4. We introduce new regularization schemes and present an extension of ComplEx (Trouillon et al., 2016) that achieves state-of-the-art performance. Additionally, we propose a new dataset for knowledge base completion constructed from Wikidata, larger than previous benchmarks by an order of magnitude, as a new reference for evaluating temporal and non-temporal link prediction methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
BYOKG-RAG: Multi-Strategy Graph Retrieval for Knowledge Graph Question Answering
BYOKG-RAG combines LLM-generated entities, paths, queries, and candidate answers with multiple graph retrieval tools to answer questions over custom knowledge graphs without training data.
-
Disentangled Multi-span Evolutionary Network against Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning
DiMNet combines multi-span cross-time message passing with disentangled active/stable node factors to set new state-of-the-art MRR on four TKG extrapolation benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.