Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

UHH-LT at SemEval-2020 Task 12: Fine-Tuning of Pre-Trained Transformer Networks for Offensive Language Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.11493 v2 pith:FNOOT4J2 submitted 2020-04-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fine-tuninglanguagenetworkspre-trainedtasktransformerclassificationdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning of pre-trained transformer networks such as BERT yield state-of-the-art results for text classification tasks. Typically, fine-tuning is performed on task-specific training datasets in a supervised manner. One can also fine-tune in unsupervised manner beforehand by further pre-training the masked language modeling (MLM) task. Hereby, in-domain data for unsupervised MLM resembling the actual classification target dataset allows for domain adaptation of the model. In this paper, we compare current pre-trained transformer networks with and without MLM fine-tuning on their performance for offensive language detection. Our MLM fine-tuned RoBERTa-based classifier officially ranks 1st in the SemEval 2020 Shared Task~12 for the English language. Further experiments with the ALBERT model even surpass this result.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Involvement drives complexity of language in online debates

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Influential Twitter users who are more partisan, negative, or offensive tend to use more lexically complex language, but the causal claim that involvement drives complexity is not supported.

Pith tools