REVIEW 3 cited by
Inconsistencies in four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We attempt to clarify several aspects concerning the recently presented four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We argue that the limiting procedure outlined in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081301 (2020)] generally involves ill-defined terms in the four dimensional field equations. Potential ways to circumvent this issue are discussed, alongside some remarks regarding specific solutions of the theory. We prove that, although linear perturbations are well behaved around maximally symmetric backgrounds, the equations for second-order perturbations are ill-defined even around a Minkowskian background. Additionally, we perform a detailed analysis of the spherically symmetric solutions, and find that the central curvature singularity can be reached within a finite proper time.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities
Generic 2D Horndeski theories arise from dimensional reduction of d≥4 gravities, yielding a Birkhoff theorem for quasi-topological gravities where static spherically symmetric solutions satisfy g_tt g_rr = -1 and are ...
-
Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions
A construction of four-dimensional pure-gravity actions whose vacuum solutions include the Hayward and Dymnikova regular black holes, via a lift from two-dimensional Horndeski theory.
-
Strong coupling and instabilities in singularity-free inflation from an infinite sum of curvature corrections
The infinite-sum Lovelock inflation solution is ruled out by strong scalar coupling and tensor Laplacian instabilities.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.