Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.13625 v2 pith:BJ3OXQ2Q submitted 2020-04-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords eventextractionargumentsansweringextractingproblemadditionalmost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of event extraction requires detecting the event trigger and extracting its corresponding arguments. Existing work in event argument extraction typically relies heavily on entity recognition as a preprocessing/concurrent step, causing the well-known problem of error propagation. To avoid this issue, we introduce a new paradigm for event extraction by formulating it as a question answering (QA) task that extracts the event arguments in an end-to-end manner. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework outperforms prior methods substantially; in addition, it is capable of extracting event arguments for roles not seen at training time (zero-shot learning setting).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Keyword-Centric Prompting for One-Shot Event Detection with Self-Generated Rationale Enhancements

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A keyword-centric prompting method with self-generated propose-and-judge rationales improves one-shot event detection F1 by up to 12.8 points over prior in-context learning baselines.

Pith tools