Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Code and Named Entity Recognition in StackOverflow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.01634 v3 pith:6VMJAFDU submitted 2020-05-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords codeentitynamedstackoverflowmillionmodelprogrammingrecognition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

There is an increasing interest in studying natural language and computer code together, as large corpora of programming texts become readily available on the Internet. For example, StackOverflow currently has over 15 million programming related questions written by 8.5 million users. Meanwhile, there is still a lack of fundamental NLP techniques for identifying code tokens or software-related named entities that appear within natural language sentences. In this paper, we introduce a new named entity recognition (NER) corpus for the computer programming domain, consisting of 15,372 sentences annotated with 20 fine-grained entity types. We trained in-domain BERT representations (BERTOverflow) on 152 million sentences from StackOverflow, which lead to an absolute increase of +10 F-1 score over off-the-shelf BERT. We also present the SoftNER model which achieves an overall 79.10 F$_1$ score for code and named entity recognition on StackOverflow data. Our SoftNER model incorporates a context-independent code token classifier with corpus-level features to improve the BERT-based tagging model. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/jeniyat/StackOverflowNER/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Language Models Potential for Requirement Engineering Applications: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ChatGPT and Gemini generally underperform task-specific models on requirements engineering benchmarks, except ChatGPT achieves a new top F1 score on the REQuestA question answering dataset.

Pith tools