REVIEW 2 cited by
Establishing Baselines for Text Classification in Low-Resource Languages
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While transformer-based finetuning techniques have proven effective in tasks that involve low-resource, low-data environments, a lack of properly established baselines and benchmark datasets make it hard to compare different approaches that are aimed at tackling the low-resource setting. In this work, we provide three contributions. First, we introduce two previously unreleased datasets as benchmark datasets for text classification and low-resource multilabel text classification for the low-resource language Filipino. Second, we pretrain better BERT and DistilBERT models for use within the Filipino setting. Third, we introduce a simple degradation test that benchmarks a model's resistance to performance degradation as the number of training samples are reduced. We analyze our pretrained model's degradation speeds and look towards the use of this method for comparing models aimed at operating within the low-resource setting. We release all our models and datasets for the research community to use.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
L3Cube-MahaEmotions: A Marathi Emotion Recognition Dataset with Synthetic Annotations using CoTR prompting and Large Language Models
A new 15,000-sentence Marathi emotion benchmark shows GPT-4 and Llama3-405B outperform fine-tuned Marathi BERT and MuRIL, while BERT trained on GPT-4-generated labels still trails GPT-4.
-
FiLLM -- A Filipino-optimized Large Language Model based on Southeast Asia Large Language Model (SEALLM)
A LoRA-tuned Filipino LLM is compared to CalamanCy and found weaker, but the reported numbers and statistical test are internally contradictory.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.