Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LinCE: A Centralized Benchmark for Linguistic Code-switching Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.04322 v1 pith:BZHIL5XN submitted 2020-05-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords benchmarkcode-switchingdifferentlincecentralizedlanguagelinguistictasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent trends in NLP research have raised an interest in linguistic code-switching (CS); modern approaches have been proposed to solve a wide range of NLP tasks on multiple language pairs. Unfortunately, these proposed methods are hardly generalizable to different code-switched languages. In addition, it is unclear whether a model architecture is applicable for a different task while still being compatible with the code-switching setting. This is mainly because of the lack of a centralized benchmark and the sparse corpora that researchers employ based on their specific needs and interests. To facilitate research in this direction, we propose a centralized benchmark for Linguistic Code-switching Evaluation (LinCE) that combines ten corpora covering four different code-switched language pairs (i.e., Spanish-English, Nepali-English, Hindi-English, and Modern Standard Arabic-Egyptian Arabic) and four tasks (i.e., language identification, named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, and sentiment analysis). As part of the benchmark centralization effort, we provide an online platform at ritual.uh.edu/lince, where researchers can submit their results while comparing with others in real-time. In addition, we provide the scores of different popular models, including LSTM, ELMo, and multilingual BERT so that the NLP community can compare against state-of-the-art systems. LinCE is a continuous effort, and we will expand it with more low-resource languages and tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multilingual Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: A Survey Across NLP Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes multilingual prompting techniques by NLP task and language family, and designates potential state-of-the-art prompting methods for each dataset.

  2. Token Masking Improves Transformer-Based Text Classification

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Randomly masking 10% of input tokens during fine-tuning yields small F1 improvements on code-switched language identification and sentiment analysis across three transformer models.

Pith tools