Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ApplicaAI at SemEval-2020 Task 11: On RoBERTa-CRF, Span CLS and Whether Self-Training Helps Them

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.07934 v2 pith:2BN3NSCD submitted 2020-05-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords taskpropagandatechniquemodelsspanroberta-crfself-trainingsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents the winning system for the propaganda Technique Classification (TC) task and the second-placed system for the propaganda Span Identification (SI) task. The purpose of TC task was to identify an applied propaganda technique given propaganda text fragment. The goal of SI task was to find specific text fragments which contain at least one propaganda technique. Both of the developed solutions used semi-supervised learning technique of self-training. Interestingly, although CRF is barely used with transformer-based language models, the SI task was approached with RoBERTa-CRF architecture. An ensemble of RoBERTa-based models was proposed for the TC task, with one of them making use of Span CLS layers we introduce in the present paper. In addition to describing the submitted systems, an impact of architectural decisions and training schemes is investigated along with remarks regarding training models of the same or better quality with lower computational budget. Finally, the results of error analysis are presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Large Language Models Good at Detecting Propaganda?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Claude 3 Opus all underperform a RoBERTa-CRF baseline on fine-grained propaganda detection, though they beat a weaker baseline on some techniques.

  2. Bangla Grammatical Error Detection Leveraging Transformer-based Token Classification

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A token-classification ensemble of BanglaBERT models with rule-based post-processing detects grammatical errors in Bangla text with a reported Levenshtein distance score of 1.04 (or 1.054, the paper is inconsistent).

Pith tools