Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Approximate Denial Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.08540 v1 pith:2SFVV46W submitted 2020-05-18 cs.DB

Approximate Denial Constraints

classification cs.DB
keywords constraintsapproximatealgorithmgeneralminingcommonlydatadefinition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The problem of mining integrity constraints from data has been extensively studied over the past two decades for commonly used types of constraints including the classic Functional Dependencies (FDs) and the more general Denial Constraints (DCs). In this paper, we investigate the problem of mining approximate DCs (i.e., DCs that are "almost" satisfied) from data. Considering approximate constraints allows us to discover more accurate constraints in inconsistent databases, detect rules that are generally correct but may have a few exceptions, as well as avoid overfitting and obtain more general and less contrived constraints. We introduce the algorithm ADCMiner for mining approximate DCs. An important feature of this algorithm is that it does not assume any specific definition of an approximate DC, but takes the semantics as input. Since there is more than one way to define an approximate DC and different definitions may produce very different results, we do not focus on one definition, but rather on a general family of approximation functions that satisfies some natural axioms defined in this paper and captures commonly used definitions of approximate constraints. We also show how our algorithm can be combined with sampling to return results with high accuracy while significantly reducing the running time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EviDC: A Violation-Guided Algorithm for Incremental Denial Constraint Discovery

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    EviDC builds a prefix tree of existing denial constraints (DCTrie) and uses it to prune incremental evidence construction, reducing runtime and evidence size versus IncDC and 3DC on tested workloads.