REVIEW
Sparse Signal Recovery from Phaseless Measurements via Hard Thresholding Pursuit
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Sparse Signal Recovery from Phaseless Measurements via Hard Thresholding Pursuit
read the original abstract
In this paper, we consider the sparse phase retrieval problem, recovering an $s$-sparse signal $\bm{x}^{\natural}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ from $m$ phaseless samples $y_i=|\langle\bm{x}^{\natural},\bm{a}_i\rangle|$ for $i=1,\ldots,m$. Existing sparse phase retrieval algorithms are usually first-order and hence converge at most linearly. Inspired by the hard thresholding pursuit (HTP) algorithm in compressed sensing, we propose an efficient second-order algorithm for sparse phase retrieval. Our proposed algorithm is theoretically guaranteed to give an exact sparse signal recovery in finite (in particular, at most $O(\log m + \log(\|\bm{x}^{\natural}\|_2/|x_{\min}^{\natural}|))$) steps, when $\{\bm{a}_i\}_{i=1}^{m}$ are i.i.d. standard Gaussian random vector with $m\sim O(s\log(n/s))$ and the initialization is in a neighborhood of the underlying sparse signal. Together with a spectral initialization, our algorithm is guaranteed to have an exact recovery from $O(s^2\log n)$ samples. Since the computational cost per iteration of our proposed algorithm is the same order as popular first-order algorithms, our algorithm is extremely efficient. Experimental results show that our algorithm can be several times faster than existing sparse phase retrieval algorithms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.