Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Continuous LWE

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.09595 v2 pith:NBHRBWCR submitted 2020-05-19 cs.CC cs.DScs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CCcs.DScs.LGstat.ML
keywords clwehardnesslearningcomputationalcontinuousdiakonikolaslatticeopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a continuous analogue of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem, which we name CLWE. We give a polynomial-time quantum reduction from worst-case lattice problems to CLWE, showing that CLWE enjoys similar hardness guarantees to those of LWE. Alternatively, our result can also be seen as opening new avenues of (quantum) attacks on lattice problems. Our work resolves an open problem regarding the computational complexity of learning mixtures of Gaussians without separability assumptions (Diakonikolas 2016, Moitra 2018). As an additional motivation, (a slight variant of) CLWE was considered in the context of robust machine learning (Diakonikolas et al.~FOCS 2017), where hardness in the statistical query (SQ) model was shown; our work addresses the open question regarding its computational hardness (Bubeck et al.~ICML 2019).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practical Secure Inference Algorithm for Fine-tuned Large Language Model Based on Fully Homomorphic Encryption

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A split-inference scheme that encrypts only the LoRA adapter weights aims for practical secure LLM inference, but the security reduction and the protocol correctness argument do not hold up.

Pith tools