REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring Model Robustness with Adaptive Networks and Improved Adversarial Training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Adversarial training has proven to be effective in hardening networks against adversarial examples. However, the gained robustness is limited by network capacity and number of training samples. Consequently, to build more robust models, it is common practice to train on widened networks with more parameters. To boost robustness, we propose a conditional normalization module to adapt networks when conditioned on input samples. Our adaptive networks, once adversarially trained, can outperform their non-adaptive counterparts on both clean validation accuracy and robustness. Our method is objective agnostic and consistently improves both the conventional adversarial training objective and the TRADES objective. Our adaptive networks also outperform larger widened non-adaptive architectures that have 1.5 times more parameters. We further introduce several practical ``tricks'' in adversarial training to improve robustness and empirically verify their efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Improving Adversarial Robustness Through Adaptive Learning-Driven Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation
A multi-teacher adversarial robustness distillation method (MTKD-AR) trains a clean-data student using cosine-similarity-weighted logits from adversarially trained teachers, reporting improved robustness on MNIST and ...
-
Copula Analysis of Risk: A Multivariate Risk Analysis for VaR and CoVaR using Copulas and DCC-GARCH
A course-project comparison of Gaussian, Student-t, Clayton, and Gumbel copulas within a DCC-GARCH pipeline, reporting in-sample goodness-of-fit and VaR/CoVaR estimates for six stocks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.