REVIEW 2 cited by
ExKMC: Expanding Explainable $k$-Means Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Despite the popularity of explainable AI, there is limited work on effective methods for unsupervised learning. We study algorithms for $k$-means clustering, focusing on a trade-off between explainability and accuracy. Following prior work, we use a small decision tree to partition a dataset into $k$ clusters. This enables us to explain each cluster assignment by a short sequence of single-feature thresholds. While larger trees produce more accurate clusterings, they also require more complex explanations. To allow flexibility, we develop a new explainable $k$-means clustering algorithm, ExKMC, that takes an additional parameter $k' \geq k$ and outputs a decision tree with $k'$ leaves. We use a new surrogate cost to efficiently expand the tree and to label the leaves with one of $k$ clusters. We prove that as $k'$ increases, the surrogate cost is non-increasing, and hence, we trade explainability for accuracy. Empirically, we validate that ExKMC produces a low cost clustering, outperforming both standard decision tree methods and other algorithms for explainable clustering. Implementation of ExKMC available at https://github.com/navefr/ExKMC.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantifying HiPSC-CM Structural Organization at Scale with Deep Learning-Enhanced SarcGraph
A deep-learning-enhanced SarcGraph detects sarcomeres in immature and mature hiPSC-CMs and uses per-sarcomere features to predict expert organization scores and cluster cells without labels.
-
Explaining Black-Box Clustering Pipelines With Cluster-Explorer
Cluster-Explorer mines concise predicate rules that cover most points in a cluster and spill little into other clusters, and reports better quality and speed than four XAI baselines on 98 clustering results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.