Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.03860 v2 pith:XYABV3WX submitted 2020-06-06 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords longlstmmemorydependencelong-termnetworksadvancementsanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The LSTM network was proposed to overcome the difficulty in learning long-term dependence, and has made significant advancements in applications. With its success and drawbacks in mind, this paper raises the question - do RNN and LSTM have long memory? We answer it partially by proving that RNN and LSTM do not have long memory from a statistical perspective. A new definition for long memory networks is further introduced, and it requires the model weights to decay at a polynomial rate. To verify our theory, we convert RNN and LSTM into long memory networks by making a minimal modification, and their superiority is illustrated in modeling long-term dependence of various datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools