Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Provable tradeoffs in adversarially robust classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05161 v5 pith:RE2S5ARX submitted 2020-06-09 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords robustclassificationareabayes-optimalclassifiersincludingproblemsresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

It is well known that machine learning methods can be vulnerable to adversarially-chosen perturbations of their inputs. Despite significant progress in the area, foundational open problems remain. In this paper, we address several key questions. We derive exact and approximate Bayes-optimal robust classifiers for the important setting of two- and three-class Gaussian classification problems with arbitrary imbalance, for $\ell_2$ and $\ell_\infty$ adversaries. In contrast to classical Bayes-optimal classifiers, determining the optimal decisions here cannot be made pointwise and new theoretical approaches are needed. We develop and leverage new tools, including recent breakthroughs from probability theory on robust isoperimetry, which, to our knowledge, have not yet been used in the area. Our results reveal fundamental tradeoffs between standard and robust accuracy that grow when data is imbalanced. We also show further results, including an analysis of classification calibration for convex losses in certain models, and finite sample rates for the robust risk.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Training from Mean Field Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A mean field framework for random ReLU networks yields adversarial-loss bounds and predicts that adversarial training shrinks weights, hurts vanilla depth, and is rescued by residual connections and width.

Pith tools