Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Neural Ordinary Differential Equations on Manifolds

Machine Learning · Submitted 11 Jun 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result we define a general methodology for building normalizing flows on manifolds.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2006.06663 (version 1)
Pith IDLQ3I6WPZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLuca Falorsi, Patrick Forr\'e. "Neural Ordinary Differential Equations on Manifolds." arXiv:2006.06663 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/LQ3I6WPZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,834 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Normalizing flows are a powerful technique for obtaining reparameterizable samples from complex multimodal distributions. Unfortunately current approaches fall short when the underlying space has a non trivial topology, and are only available for the most basic geometries. Recently normalizing flows in Euclidean space based on Neural ODEs show great promise, yet suffer the same limitations. Using ideas from differential geometry and geometric control theory, we describe how neural ODEs can be extended to smooth manifolds. We show how vector fields provide a general framework for parameterizing a flexible class of invertible mapping on these spaces and we illustrate how gradient based learning can be performed. As a result we define a general methodology for building normalizing flows on manifolds.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Normalizing flows are a powerful technique for obtaining reparameterizable samples from complex multimodal distributions. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Unfortunately current approaches fall short when the underlying space has a non trivial topology, and are only available for the most basic geometries. gap 0.89 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Recently normalizing flows in Euclidean space based on Neural ODEs show great promise, yet suffer the same limitations. background 0.68 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.96
s3 Using ideas from differential geometry and geometric control theory, we describe how neural ODEs can be extended to smooth manifolds. contribution 0.89 0.85 0.16 asserted 0.97
s4 We show how vector fields provide a general framework for parameterizing a flexible class of invertible mapping on these spaces and we illustrate how gradient based learning can be performed. method 0.66 0.92 0.20 asserted 1.00
s5 As a result we define a general methodology for building normalizing flows on manifolds. contribution 0.94 0.91 0.78 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.57.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Normalizing flows are a powerful technique for obtaining reparameterizable samples from complex multimodal distributions. Unfortunately current approaches fall short when the underlying space has a non trivial topology, and are only available for the most basic geometries. Recently normalizing flows in Euclidean space based on Neural ODEs show great promise, yet suffer the same limitations. Using ideas from differential geometry and geometric control theory, we describe how neural ODEs can be extended to smooth manifolds. We show how vector fields provide a general framework for parameterizing a flexible class of invertible mapping on these spaces and we illustrate how gradient based learning can be performed. As a result we define a general methodology for building normalizing flows on manifolds.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

25 arXiv papers cite this in 35 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 16 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
  • We note in passing that some authors [ref] have reported competitive or even superior performance in a similar setting by replacing the projection method with continuous normalizing flows for Riemannian manifolds.

    A Review of Change of Variable Formulas for Generative Modeling · Data on Embedded Manifolds · 0.85

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • This exponential amplification carries over to learned vector fields, where projection or retraction steps are needed to keep iterates close to the constraint set [ref] , so feasibility degrades with both network expressivity (which controls $L$) and integration horizon.

    Learning Unbiased Permutations via Flow Matching · Related Work · 0.98

Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.