REVIEW 3 cited by
Search for Axionlike-Particle-Induced Prompt Gamma-Ray Emission from Extragalactic Core-Collapse Supernovae with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
During a core-collapse supernova (SN), axionlike particles (ALPs) could be produced through the Primakoff process and subsequently convert into $\gamma$ rays in the magnetic field of the Milky Way. We do not find evidence for such a $\gamma$-ray burst in observations of extragalactic SNe with the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). The SN explosion times are estimated from optical light curves and we find a probability of about $\sim$90% that the LAT observed at least one SN at the time of the core collapse. Under the assumption that at least one SN was contained within the LAT field of view, we exclude photon-ALP couplings $\gtrsim 2.6\times10^{-11}$GeV$^{-1}$ for ALP masses $m_a \lesssim 3\times 10^{-10}$ eV, within a factor of $\sim 5$ of previous limits from SN1987A.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Axiverse Lampposts
In a hierarchical multi-axion theory with random couplings, axion field ranges shrink with 1/sqrt(N), generic axion–SM couplings are suppressed, but the QCD axion's coupling is unsuppressed.
-
Time-delayed gamma-ray signatures of heavy axions from core-collapse supernovae
No gamma-ray excess from four supernovae in Fermi-LAT data yields the strongest constraints yet on MeV-to-GeV heavy axions coupled to both QED and QCD.
-
Fresh look at the diffuse ALP background from supernovae
Adding pion conversion to the diffuse supernova ALP background tightens the Fermi-LAT bound on the ALP-photon coupling to about 2e-13 GeV^-1 for ultralight ALPs, and SN 1987A remains roughly ten times stronger.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.