REVIEW 1 cited by
Weak Supervision and Referring Attention for Temporal-Textual Association Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A system capturing the association between video frames and textual queries offer great potential for better video analysis. However, training such a system in a fully supervised way inevitably demands a meticulously curated video dataset with temporal-textual annotations. Therefore we provide a Weak-Supervised alternative with our proposed Referring Attention mechanism to learn temporal-textual association (dubbed WSRA). The weak supervision is simply a textual expression (e.g., short phrases or sentences) at video level, indicating this video contains relevant frames. The referring attention is our designed mechanism acting as a scoring function for grounding the given queries over frames temporally. It consists of multiple novel losses and sampling strategies for better training. The principle in our designed mechanism is to fully exploit 1) the weak supervision by considering informative and discriminative cues from intra-video segments anchored with the textual query, 2) multiple queries compared to the single video, and 3) cross-video visual similarities. We validate our WSRA through extensive experiments for temporally grounding by languages, demonstrating that it outperforms the state-of-the-art weakly-supervised methods notably.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RG-SAN: Rule-Guided Spatial Awareness Network for End-to-End 3D Referring Expression Segmentation
A rule-guided spatial-aware network that localizes all mentioned entities in a 3D scene and uses target-position weak supervision raises ScanRefer 3D-RES mIoU from 39.5 to 44.6.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.