Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 1

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.12020 v1 pith:S4KK55VL submitted 2020-06-22 cs.AI

OHAAI Collaboration: Federico Castagna , Timotheus Kampik , Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi , Mickaël Lafages , Jack Mumford , Christos T. Rodosthenous , Samy Sá , Stefan Sarkadi
show 3 more authors
Joseph Singleton Kenneth Skiba Andreas Xydis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords argumentationargumenthandbookresearchvolumeohaaionlineaccess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the first volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI). Previously, formal theories of argument and argument interaction have been proposed and studied, and this has led to the more recent study of computational models of argument. Argumentation, as a field within artificial intelligence (AI), is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. The purpose of this handbook is to provide an open access and curated anthology for the argumentation research community. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools