Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ReproduceMeGit: A Visualization Tool for Analyzing Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.12110 v1 pith:Q66BWL3C submitted 2020-06-22 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords notebooksreproducibilitytooljupyterrepositoryanalyzingcodegithub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Computational notebooks have gained widespread adoption among researchers from academia and industry as they support reproducible science. These notebooks allow users to combine code, text, and visualizations for easy sharing of experiments and results. They are widely shared in GitHub, which currently has more than 100 million repositories making it the largest host of source code in the world. Recent reproducibility studies have indicated that there exist good and bad practices in writing these notebooks which can affect their overall reproducibility. We present ReproduceMeGit, a visualization tool for analyzing the reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks. This will help repository users and owners to reproduce and directly analyze and assess the reproducibility of any GitHub repository containing Jupyter Notebooks. The tool provides information on the number of notebooks that were successfully reproducible, those that resulted in exceptions, those with different results from the original notebooks, etc. Each notebook in the repository along with the provenance information of its execution can also be exported in RDF with the integration of the ProvBook tool.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging MIMIC Datasets for Better Digital Health: A Review on Open Problems, Progress Highlights, and Future Promises

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A narrative survey of MIMIC dataset challenges that is undermined by incorrect citations and unsourced performance tables.

Pith tools