REVIEW 2 cited by
Complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model in the double scaling limit
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We solve for the exact energy spectrum, 2-point and 4-point functions of the complex SYK model, in the double scaling limit at all energy scales. This model has a $U(1)$ global symmetry. The analysis shows how to incorporate a chemical potential in the chord diagram picture, and we present results for the various observables also at a given fixed charge sector. In addition to matching to the spectral asymmetry, we consider an analogous asymmetry measure of the 2-point function obeying a non-trivial dependence on the operator's dimension. We also provide the chord diagram structure for an SYK-like model that has a $U(M)$ global symmetry at any disorder realization. We then show how to exactly compute the effect of inserting very heavy operators, with formally infinite conformal dimension. The latter separate the gravitational spacetime into several parts connected by an interface, whose properties are exactly computable at all scales. In particular, light enough states can still go between the spaces. This behavior has a simple description in the chord diagram picture.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Schur Connections: Chord Counting, Line Operators, and Indices
The Schur half-index of pure 4d N=2 SU(N) SYM with Wilson line insertions equals a q-oscillator vacuum expectation value, shown to be the partition function of the relativistic open Toda chain.
-
Grand Canonical vs Canonical Krylov Complexity in Double-Scaled Complex SYK Model
In double-scaled complex SYK, grand-canonical Krylov complexity is the charge-weighted sum of canonical complexities, saturating a conjectured inequality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.