Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Reionization inference from the CMB optical depth and E-mode polarization power spectra

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.16828 v2 pith:UTTFRMPB submitted 2020-06-30 astro-ph.CO

Reionization inference from the CMB optical depth and E-mode polarization power spectra

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords constraintsinferencemodelsobservationsphysicalreionizationstatisticbasis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The Epoch of Reionization (EoR) depends on the complex astrophysics governing the birth and evolution of the first galaxies and structures in the intergalactic medium. EoR models rely on cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations, and in particular the large-scale E-mode polarization power spectra (EE PS), to help constrain their highly uncertain parameters. However, rather than directly forward-modelling the EE PS, most EoR models are constrained using a summary statistic -- the Thompson scattering optical depth, $\tau_e$. Compressing CMB observations to $\tau_e$ requires adopting a basis set for the EoR history. The common choice is the unphysical, redshift-symmetric hyperbolic tangent (Tanh) function, which differs in shape from physical EoR models based on hierarchical structure formation. Combining public EoR and CMB codes, 21cmFAST and CLASS, here we quantify how inference using the $\tau_e$ summary statistic impacts the resulting constraints on galaxy properties and EoR histories. Using the last Planck 2018 data release, we show that the marginalized constraints on the EoR history are more sensitive to the choice of the basis set (Tanh vs physical model) than to the CMB likelihood statistic ($\tau_e$ vs PS). For example, EoR histories implied by the growth of structure show a small tail of partial reionization extending to higher redshifts. However, biases in inference using $\tau_e$ are negligible for the Planck 2018 data. Using EoR constraints from high-redshift observations including the quasar dark fraction, galaxy UV luminosity functions and CMB EE PS, our physical model recovers $\tau_e=0.0569^{+0.0081}_{-0.0066}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CAMB v2: cosmological power spectra for high-precision surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    CAMB v2's default settings produce lensed CMB and matter power spectra converged to 10^-3 over survey-relevant scales, using a new flat-Bessel mapping for hyperspherical Bessel functions.

  2. A New Boundary Condition on Reionization

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A zero-lag Pearson correlation between 21-cm and line-intensity maps is predicted to drop sharply at ionized fractions of 1-10%, providing a novel marker for the onset of reionization.

  3. BROOM: a python package for model-independent analysis of microwave astronomical data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    BROOM is a Python package that applies ILC and GILC techniques for model-independent separation of CMB, SZ, and foreground signals in microwave data along with diagnostic and simulation utilities.