Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Proofs of Useless Work -- Positive and Negative Results for Wasteless Mining Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.01046 v2 pith:QGP2RWX6 submitted 2020-07-02 cs.CR cs.DCcs.MA

classification cs.CRcs.DCcs.MA
keywords problemssystemsystemsworkpropertieswastelessbitcoinefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many blockchain systems today, including Bitcoin, rely on Proof of Work (PoW). Proof of work is crucial to the liveness and security of cryptocurrencies. The assumption when using PoW is that a lot of trial and error is required on average before a valid block is generated. One of the main concerns raised with regard to this kind of system is the inherent need to "waste" energy on "meaningless" problems. In fact, the Bitcoin system is believed to consume more electricity than several small countries. In this work we formally define three properties that are necessary for wasteless PoW systems: (1) solve "meaningful" problems (2) solve them efficiently and (3) be secure against double-spend attacks. These properties aim to create an open market for problem-solving, in which miners produce solutions to problems in the most efficient way (wasteless). The security of the system stems from the economical incentive created by the demand for solutions to these problems. We analyze these properties, and deduce constraints that must apply to such PoW systems. In our main result, we conclude that under realistic assumptions, the set of allowed problems must be preimage resistant functions in order to keep the system secure and efficient.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SNARKChain: Proof-of-Useful-Work Blockchain Consensus with General-Purpose SNARK Marketplace

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A proof-of-useful-work protocol where mining consists of generating client-outsourced zk-SNARK proofs, claimed to be the first consensus-layer general-purpose SNARK marketplace satisfying PoW properties.

  2. ScaloWork: Useful Proof-of-Work with Distributed Pool Mining

    cs.CR 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    ScaloWork replaces hash-based mining with minimum dominating set problems on isomorphic graph instances and uses distributed pool mining to scale and prevent solution stealing.

Pith tools