Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.01458 v3 pith:XGTOLHOB submitted 2020-07-03 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords confidencedeepnetworksestimatesmethodneuralproposedtraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the power of deep neural networks for a wide range of tasks, an overconfident prediction issue has limited their practical use in many safety-critical applications. Many recent works have been proposed to mitigate this issue, but most of them require either additional computational costs in training and/or inference phases or customized architectures to output confidence estimates separately. In this paper, we propose a method of training deep neural networks with a novel loss function, named Correctness Ranking Loss, which regularizes class probabilities explicitly to be better confidence estimates in terms of ordinal ranking according to confidence. The proposed method is easy to implement and can be applied to the existing architectures without any modification. Also, it has almost the same computational costs for training as conventional deep classifiers and outputs reliable predictions by a single inference. Extensive experimental results on classification benchmark datasets indicate that the proposed method helps networks to produce well-ranked confidence estimates. We also demonstrate that it is effective for the tasks closely related to confidence estimation, out-of-distribution detection and active learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable Failure Detection with Human-Level Concepts

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ORCA ranks concept activations from CLIP and uses the rank-weighted agreement of the top-K concepts with the predicted category as its confidence score, improving failure-detection FPR on several benchmarks.

Pith tools