Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.02923 v1 pith:SVEXQHXO submitted 2020-07-06 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords deletionablealgorithmsconvexdatagiveindistinguishableobservable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the data deletion problem for convex models. By leveraging techniques from convex optimization and reservoir sampling, we give the first data deletion algorithms that are able to handle an arbitrarily long sequence of adversarial updates while promising both per-deletion run-time and steady-state error that do not grow with the length of the update sequence. We also introduce several new conceptual distinctions: for example, we can ask that after a deletion, the entire state maintained by the optimization algorithm is statistically indistinguishable from the state that would have resulted had we retrained, or we can ask for the weaker condition that only the observable output is statistically indistinguishable from the observable output that would have resulted from retraining. We are able to give more efficient deletion algorithms under this weaker deletion criterion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unlearning as Distribution Restoration: A Controlled Counterfactual Study, a Validated Selective Screen, and the Limits of Oracle-Free Certification

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Matching a retrained oracle on trained probes can certify models that still retain held-out forget knowledge, and oracle-free unlearning certification is only possible for counterfactual, non-inferable facts.

  2. Agents Are All You Need for LLM Unlearning

    cs.AI 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A four-agent pipeline, Vanilla, AuditErase, Critic, and Composer, filters target references out of LLM responses, claiming robust and scalable inference-time unlearning without weight updates.

Pith tools