Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SESAME: Software defined Enclaves to Secure Inference Accelerators with Multi-tenant Execution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06751 v2 pith:XIWLUF2F submitted 2020-07-14 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords compilerenclaveshardwaremulti-tenantperformancesecuritysesameaccelerator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Hardware-enclaves that target complex CPU designs compromise both security and performance. Programs have little control over micro-architecture, which leads to side-channel leaks, and then have to be transformed to have worst-case control- and data-flow behaviors and thus incur considerable slowdown. We propose to address these security and performance problems by bringing enclaves into the realm of accelerator-rich architectures. The key idea is to construct software-defined enclaves (SDEs) where the protections and slowdown are tied to an application-defined threat model and tuned by a compiler for the accelerator's specific domain. This vertically integrated approach requires new hardware data-structures to partition, clear, and shape the utilization of hardware resources; and a compiler that instantiates and schedules these data-structures to create multi-tenant enclaves on accelerators. We demonstrate our ideas with a comprehensive prototype -- Sesame -- that includes modifications to compiler, ISA, and microarchitecture to a decoupled access execute (DAE) accelerator framework for deep learning models. Our security evaluation shows that classifiers that could distinguish different layers in VGG, ResNet, and AlexNet, fail to do so when run using Sesame. Our synthesizable hardware prototype (on a Xilinx Pynq board) demonstrates how the compiler and micro-architecture enables threat-model-specific trade-offs in code size increase ranging from 3-7 $\%$ and run-time performance overhead for specific defenses ranging from 3.96$\%$ to 34.87$\%$ (across confidential inputs and models and single vs. multi-tenant systems).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: A Systems Perspective on Compound AI Threats and Countermeasures

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematization of software and hardware attacks and defenses for compound AI systems, arguing that cross-layer attack composition reduces the threat model burden on attackers.

Pith tools