REVIEW 1 cited by
Introduction to Random Fields
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
General linear models (GLM) are often constructed and used in statistical inference at the voxel level in brain imaging. In this paper, we explore the basics of random fields and the multiple comparisons on the random fields, which are necessary to properly threshold statistical maps for the whole image at specific statistical significance level. The multiple comparisons are crucial in determining overall statistical significance in correlated test statistics over the whole brain. In practice, t- or F-statistics in adjacent voxels are correlated. So there is the problem of multiple comparisons, which we have simply neglected up to now. For multiple comparisons that account for spatially correlated test statistics, various methods were proposed: Bonferroni correction, random field theory, false discovery rates and permutation tests. Among them, we will explore the random field approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Regularity Conditions for Critical Point Convergence
With C1 convergence plus a positive lower bound on critical point spacing, maxima, minima, and saddle counts converge; with C2 convergence to a Morse function, Morse index counts converge.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.