REVIEW 2 cited by
Termwise versus globally stoquastic local Hamiltonians: questions of complexity and sign-curing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We elucidate the distinction between global and termwise stoquasticity for local Hamiltonians and prove several complexity results. We show that the stoquastic local Hamiltonian problem is $\textbf{StoqMA}$-complete even for globally stoquastic Hamiltonians. We study the complexity of deciding whether a local Hamiltonian is globally stoquastic or not. In particular, we prove $\textbf{coNP}$-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity in a fixed basis and $\Sigma_2^p$-hardness of deciding global stoquasticity under single-qubit transformations. As a last result, we expand the class of sign-curing transformations by showing how Clifford transformations can sign-cure a class of disordered 1D $XYZ$ Hamiltonians.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The power of unentanglement without destructive interference
StoqMA(2) contains NP with Õ(√n)-qubit proofs and completeness error 2^{-polylog(n)}, is contained in EXP, and satisfies StoqMA(k)=StoqMA(2) for k≥2 when completeness error is negligible.
-
Dismantling the Stoquastic Dichotomy
VGP, not stoquasticity, is the invariant boundary: the VGP-local Hamiltonian problem is StoqMA-complete, and recognizing VGP is PSPACE-complete.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.